Talk:Aqaba Flagpole

Jordan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jordan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jordan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JordanWikipedia:WikiProject JordanTemplate:WikiProject JordanJordan articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks YOU can help with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Heraldry and vexillology

Aqaba Flagpole is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

Which is the first?

It is said in the article this is the second longest flagpole. which one is the first??? shouln't that info be included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steloukos (talk • contribs) 18:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is the first. That is what the source says and what this article used to say. I am changing it now.--189.33.10.60 (talk) 20:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expand

In addition to what is above, this article needs to tell more about the history of the pole, as the specifications tell nothing about the history of the pole and the ideas behind it. I also agree with Steloukos above. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tall Story

There seems to be some confusion, as this article says that the flagpole is 137m tall, but in the technical data section it gives its height as 132m.

Also, in the entry on the Raghadan Flagpole (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raghadan_Flagpole), the article states that the Aqaba Flagpole stands at 137 metres tall, but then goes on to claim that the tallest flagpole is the Ashgabat Flagpole at 133 metres tall. Now maths are not my strong point, but I'm sure that 133m is not greater than 137m. —Preceding unsigned comment added by El Badboy! (talk • contribs) 16:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a lot of confusion indeed, but I changed the article to state that it's the world second tallest flagpole, because the builder himself states on his own website that it's 130m tall, and the Guinness World Records currently goes to the Ashbagad flag in Turkmenistan at 133m tall. I believe those to be the most credible references on the subject.געגאנגען/Gegangen (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Built in ?

When was it built? --Pilettes (talk) 16:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aqaba Flagpole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]